Realizing the need of bivoltine silk, as a substitute for the import, that suit to power looms and export oriented units in the country, the Government of India promoting bivoltine sericulture by implementing a number of programmes. Introduction of productive bivoltine single and double hybrids revolutionised the sericulture industry during 12th plan (2012-13 to 2016-17). Towards this, systematic breed maintenance is the primary requisite to maintain the genetic compositions of the parents and combine well to express full potentiality in their hybrids. Thus, In the present study, hybrid vigour in terms of heterosis for different crossing pattern involving four oval (CSR2, CSR17, CSR27 and S8) and four dumb-bell (CSR4, CSR6, CSR16 and CSR26) type cocoons of bivoltine parental breeds was investigated considering important economic traits. All the parental breeds and their hybrids of different crossing pattern (single cross, foundation cross and double cross) were reared employing one way system of breed maintenance and standard rearing technique of bivoltine rearing, respectively at P4 Basic Seed Farm, Hassan. The analysed data indicates that the parental breeds were not only confirming the original breed characteristics but also expressed relative heterosis positively in their crosses for all the nine economic traits studied. Thus, we suppose that breed maintenance is mandatory not only to maintain the purity and stability of breeds but also to express their hybrid vigour in their crosses, which facilitate to exploit full potentiality of the hybrids in the field.
Dayananda*
P4 Basic Seed Farm, Hassan-573 217, Karnataka, INDIA
V. Sivaprasad
Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Berhampore-742 101, West Bengal, INDIA
V. Nishita Naik
S.M. Hukkeri
Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysuru- 570 008, Karnataka, INDIA
R.S. Teotia
Dayananda., Sivaprasad, V., Naik, V.N., Hukkeri, S.M., Teotia, R.S., 2019. Impact of systematic maintenance of bivoltine parental breeds on the expression of hybrid vigour. Innovative Farming, 4(2): 83-90.
Anonymous. 2017. Annual report 2016-17 of Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles: Government of India, Bengaluru, India, p.83.
Basavaraja, H.K., S.B. Dandin., M. Baig., K.V. Benchamin., A. Yamaguchi and H. Yanagava. 2004. Guidelines for bivoltine silkworm race maintenance and multiplication at BSF/GSF. JICA-CSB pub., India, pp. 01-37.
Bhargav, S.K., V. Thigarajan and E. Rajalakshmi. 1996. Hetorotic expression in silk productivity in different crosses of silkworm Bombyx mori. Indian Veterinary Journal, 73: 176-180.
Charlesworth, O and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18: 237-268.
Datta, R.K. 1992. Guidelines for bivoltine silkworm rearing. Central Silk Board pub., Bengaluru, India.
Falconer, D.S. 1960. Introduction to Qualitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd Eds., Edinburgh.
Harada, C. 1961. Heterosis of quantitative characters in the silkworm. Bulletin of Sericulture. Experimental Station, 17:1-52.
Hedrick, P.W and S.T. Kalinowski. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 31:139-162.
Kalpana, G.V., K.B. Chandra Shekar and B.B. Bindroo. 2013. Impact of systematic bivoltine silkworm breed maintenance on the consistency in the expression of breed characters over generations at P4 level. Biospectra, 8 (2): 67-72.
Kobayashi, E., T. Gamo and Y. Otsuka. 1968. Analysis of Heterosis by means of diallel cross between different regional varieties of the silkworm. Data of a pilot Experiment. Journal of Sericulture Science, Japan, 37:144-150.
Lande, R. and D.W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. Genetic models, Evolution, 39: 24-40.
Mal Reddy, N., A. Naseema Begum., K.B. Chandra Shekar., S. Nirmal Kumar and S.M.H. Qadri. 2012. Expression of Hybrid Vigour in different crossing pattern involving the bivoltine silkworm (Bombyx mori) parents. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 51 (1): 26-31.
Mano, Y. 1994. Comprehensive report on silkworm breeding. Central Silk Board pub., Bengaluru, India, p.180.
Mano, Y., S. Nirmal Kumar., H.K. Basavaraja., N. Mal Reddy and R.K. Datta. 1993. A new method to select promising silkworm breeds/combinations. Indian Silk, 31 (10): p.53.
Nirmal Kumar, S., M. Ramesh Babu., H.K. Basavaraja., N. Mal Reddy and R.K. Datta. 1998. Double hybrids for improve silk production in silkworm Bombyx mori In: Silkworm Breeding , (Eds.) G. Srirama Reddy, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, Calcutta, India, pp. 209-217.
Nirupama, R., Ravindra Singh and C.K. Kamble. 2008. Identification of silkworm breeds and hybrids through evaluation indices and cocoon size variability. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 47 (2): 183-187.
Ravindra Singh, G.V. Kalpana., P.S. Rao and M. Ahsan. 1998. Studies on cocoon shapes in different crosses of the mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 37 (1): 85-88.
Singh, R.K. and B.D. Chaudhury. 1977. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Pub., New Delhi, India.