A study was undertaken with seven Indian popular cassava varieties viz. CO2, CO3, CO(TP)4, H165, H226, MVD1 and Kunguma Rose (KR) cultivated under rainfed condition to find out the feasibility of diverting a part of foliage for rearing of eri silkworm as a source of additional income without affecting the crop produce. The rearing capacity of eri silkworm, was estimated based on the availability of total foliage at the time of removal of week shoots 6 months after plantation (6 MAP) by farmers, forced leaf harvests from 7-9 MAP and finally at the time of tuber harvest (10 MAP). The forced leaf harvests up to 30% once at 8 MAP did not affect the tuber yield and starch content of the tubers in the variety MVD1. The varieties CO3, CO4 and H165 could tolerate leaf plucking up to 20% whereas CO2, H226 and Kunguma Rose were found highly sensitive in which leaf harvest @ 10% only found safe on yield and quality of main produce. Highest foliage yield (6.373 MT/ha)and rearing capacity (797 dfls) of eri silkworm were recorded with H165 without affecting yield and quality of the tuber. The variety MVD1 (4.450 MT/ha & 556 dfls) was found next best suited whereas CO2 was registered lowest foliage yield (1.566 MT/ha) and rearing capacity (196dfls). Based on the overall foliage availability without adverse impact on tuber quality and yield, the order of merit of cassava varieties suitable for ericulture was H165> MVD1> CO3 > Kunguma Rose > CO4 > H226 > CO2 under rainfed conditions.
N. Sakthivel*
Regional Sericultural Research Station, Central Silk Board, Government of India, Salem – 636017, Tamil Nadu, INDIA;
S.M.H. Qadri
Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore – 570 008, Karnataka, INDIA
Sakthivel, N., Qadri, S.M.H., 2018. Studies on feasibility of utilizing rainfed cassava for ericulture. Innovative Farming, 3(2): 64-71.
Ahmad, M.I. 1973. Potential fodder and tuber yields of two varieties of tapioca. Malaysian Agricultural Journal, 49: 166-174.
Bainbridge, Z., K. Tomlins, K. Wellings and A. Westby. 1996. Methods for Assessing Quality Characteristics of Non-Grain Starch Staples (Part 2. Field Methods), Natural Resources Institute, Chatman, UK.
Fasae, O.A., I.F. Adu, A.B.J. Aina and K.A. Elemo. 2009. Production, defoliation and storage of cassava leaves as dry season forage for small ruminants in small holder crop livestock production system. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 42(1): 15-19.
George, J., C.R. Mohankumar, G.M. Nair and C.S. Ravindran. 2000. Cassava agronomy research and adoption of improved practices in India- Major achievements during the past 30 years. In: Proceeding of the 6th Regional Cassava Workshop. 21-25 February 2000. International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam, pp.279-299.
Gomez, G. and M. Valdivieso. 1984. Cassava for animal feeding: Effect of variety and plant age on production of leaves and roots. Animal Feed Science Technology, 11: 49-55.
Hong, N.T.T., M. Wanapat, C. Wachirapakorn, P. Pakdee and P. Rowlinson. 2003. Effects of timing of initial cutting and subsequent cutting on yield and chemical composition of cassava hay and its supplementation on lactating dairy cows. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 16: 1763-1769.
Jalloh, A. 1998. Cassava plant population and leaf harvesting effects on the productivity of cassava – rice intercrop on the upland in Sierra Leone. Tropical Agriculture, 75: 67-71.
Jayaraj, S., D. Amuthamurugan, K. Subramanian, M. Mahesh Kumar, C. Madesu, S.M.H. Qadri, N. Sakthivel, R. Anbalagan and P.J. Mathew. 2004. Ericulture in Tamil Nadu, Pondicherry and Kerala states in India: A study on feasibility, technology development, refinement and transfer. Half Yearly Progress Report for the Period Ending 31 December 2004, Central Silk Board, Bangalore, India, pp.40-45.
Lockard, R.G., M.A. Saqui and D.D. Wounuah. 1985. Effects of time and frequency of leaf harvest on growth and yield of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) in Liberia. Field Crops Research, 12: 175-180.
Mandal, R.C., K.D. Singh and S.B. Maini. 1973. Effect of plant density, fertility level and shoot number on tuber yield and quality of tapioca. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 18: 498-503.
Phengvichith, V., S. Ledin, P. Horne and I. Ledin. 2006. Effect of different fertilizers and harvest frequencies on foliage and tuber yield and chemical composition of foliage from two cassava (Manihot esculenta, Crantz) varieties. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 6(3): 177-187.
Phengvilaysouk, A. and M. Wanapat. 2008. Study on the effect of harvesting frequency on cassava foliage for cassava hay production and its nutritive value. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 20 (Supplement): 1-7.
Ravindran, V. and A.S.B. Rajaguru. 1988. Effect of stem pruning on cassava root yield and leaf growth. Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25(2): 32-37.
Sakthivel, N., S.M.H. Qadri, R. Anbazhagan, T.S. Krishnamoorthy and S. Jayaraj. 2010. Cropping system of eri food plants for economically viable ericulture in Tamil Nadu. Asian Textile Journal, 19(4): 70-76.
Simwambana, M.S.C., T.U. Ferguson and D.S.O. Osiru. 1992. The effects of time to first shoot removal on leaf vegetable quality in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture, 60: 319-325.
Singh, J. and D.R. Chaudhury. 1985. Effect of topping and defoliation in tapioca. Journal of Root Crops, 7: 86.
Sundararaj, N., S. Nagaraju, M.N. Venkataramu and M.K. Jagannath. 1972. Design and Analysis of Field Experiments. Directorate of Research, UAS, Bangalore. P.419.
Tung, C.M., J.B. Liang, S.L. Tan, H.K. Ong and Z.A. Jelan. 2001. Foliage productivity and growth persistency of three local cassava varieties. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 14: 1253-125.